RE: Digitals Missing From New BoMs?
That's a different Tim, I was opposed to that change at the time and had an exchange of emails with Exson on the subject.
The thing is that the sequence number doesn't actually do anything anyway. The guy who wrote the original sequence number code had plans for it, but got put off, and I think works on Frontaccounting these days, so never finished the functionality he was aiming for. Originally it was written as an integer, as sequence numbers normally are. If there are users who use floating point numbers as sequence numbers (are you saying you do?) then I am happy to look again at it, I just couldn't see any use case for it and it just added unnecessary complexity. Our aim in webERP has always been to keep things simple wherever possible.
I put a button on the screen to renumber the sequence of the BOM in steps of 10 if people wanted it, and as I remember if somebody did have a sequence number of 3.14 that will now be shown as 314, so the sequence should still be maintained.
Tim
|