Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nit Pick on Margin Terminology
11-29-2017, 10:04 PM (This post was last modified: 11-30-2017 12:18 AM by VortecCPI.)
Post: #1
Nit Pick on Margin Terminology
I hate to even bring this up but I will...

"GP %" and "Gross Margin" and "Gross Profit Percent"...

Markup = (Price - Cost) / Cost < For reference
Margin = (Price - Cost) / Price < Used in webERP

In my opinion...

The term "GP %" should really be "GM %" because it is a margin calculation (M), not a profit amount (P).

The term "Gross Margin" should really be "Gross Profit" because it is a profit amount, not a margin calculation.

The term "Gross Profit Percent" should really be "Gross Margin Percent" because it is a margin calculation, not a profit amount.

I bring this up only because we just had discussions around Margin versus Markup versus Profit a few days ago. There was a lot of misunderstanding and misuse of the terms by the owners. In our reports I have changed the language file to reflect what is written above.

All that being said the financial reports coming out of webERP look great. Very good work and a big hats-off to all of you who worked on this!

https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclipsepaulbecker
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-29-2017, 11:36 PM
Post: #2
RE: Nit Pick on Terminology
I think this is a transatlantic difference. Here in the UK gross margin is used less often, mostly it is referred to as Gross Profit, defined in my copy of Frank Wood as:

a Excess of sales over cost of goods sold or
b Sales less Purchases or
c Cost of goods sold + Opening stock or
d Net profit less expenses of the period.

Probably the place to change this is in the en_US translation file.

Tim
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-29-2017, 11:53 PM
Post: #3
RE: Nit Pick on Terminology
Thank you Tim. I should likely always preface my comments with my locale so it has better context.

The owners had a big argument over this terminology because it can be confusing.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclipsepaulbecker
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-29-2017, 11:57 PM
Post: #4
RE: Nit Pick on Terminology
It can be confusing and webERP does sometimes mix UK/USA terms somewhat arbitrarily such as Stock/Inventory Suppliers/Vendors etc. It's one of those not particularly exciting jobs that need doing at some point Smile

Tim
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-30-2017, 12:00 AM
Post: #5
RE: Nit Pick on Terminology
While I agree there may be a few stragglers in the .PO file you guys have done a great job with USA terms. There were only a few places we still had "Supplier" in lieu of "Vendor".

After over 100 hours of setup, config, and initial testing I am thoroughly impressed with webERP.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclipsepaulbecker
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)