A confusing issue here is that we have two fields referring to cheques. One in the header of the transaction for "cheque number" which only gets used if pre-printed cheque stationery is being used, and another called "Cheque/Voucher number" for the line item. As I don't have any customers using pre-printed stationery I usually remove the cheque option in the header, and then show the "Cheque/Voucher Number" field in the reconciliation/matching screens removing any possibility for confusion. I seem to remember Paul that you said pre-printed stationery was still used for your company so this may not be any use for you??
Also... Entering an amount in the textbox has no affect in my instance -- Only works in Receipt mode...
Same for webERP demo...
(09-05-2018, 01:41 AM)falkoner Wrote: Yes, it seems to have got in a muddle somehow. This is what my screen looks like which is probably how it used to look
I will try to have a look at the code... Is yours current it the repo?
Okay... When in Payment mode amount must be negative...
This line needs to go away:
PHP Code:
<th class="ascending">' . $TypeName . '</th>
Thank you for giving me some insight on this issue!
I believe the attached file addresses this issue for 4.15.0.
(09-05-2018, 01:43 AM)VortecCPI Wrote: I will try to have a look at the code... Is yours current it the repo?
The attached is my code. I think it is basically how it used to be, and there were some changes to the code that I didn't include in mine as I felt they worsened what was already there.
The table data formatting is wrong and we should add cheque numbers. I also changed the head captions as I found them to be confusing and not matching Bank Register.
Attached is my version revised from GIT until I have time to check Tim's... Though if I had to make a bet I would say we should just use Tim's.
You can use mine to very easily see what I changed to fix it and then go on to Tim's to verify functionality.
Whenever each of you have a chance, can you please try the attached script?
Each file has your name included, so remove that portion to check.
What's the difference?
Well, both scripts have ~98% Tim's file, with Paul's changes manually merged.
The ~2% (if not less) differences being CSS, the sorting reference, and not using printf() between the two repo's.
Tim's file keeps the same 3 sortable columns (using his reference), where the other file has the first several columns sortable (using the other reference).